Morning Call – February 23, 2005

Upper Perk Teacher Contract Palisades Pennridge Quakertown Comparison

 

Dear Friends,

            Good morning. “I’ve had no phone calls since the vote,” Dr. Timothy Kirby told me, referring to the Upper Perkiomen School District’s new teachers’ contract. “I’ve received no Emails…it’s been quiet,” the school superintendent continued.

            Two weeks ago, the school board narrowly approved the new five-year deal, 5 to 4. The contract covers 221 full and part time teachers. The annual raises range from 3.6 to 4.15 percent. In the 2005-06 school year, the lowest teacher salary will be $37,501; the highest $84,562. Years of service and advanced degrees make the difference. The average salary will be $72,413 in the first year. In the final year, the salaries will range from $41,594 to $93,789.

            How does Upper Perk compare to Palisades, Pennridge and Quakertown school districts? They’re quite similar.

            Liz Torgerson is the Human Resources Director at Palisades. “We’re in the third year of a three year contract,” she began. “Starting teachers receive $35,672; the top pay is $85,904 and the average is $66,528.” I asked her whether the school board vote was unanimous or split? “I don’t remember,” she replied, “But those kind of votes are not usually unanimous.”

            Shellie Feola is the Director of Human Resources at Pennridge. Its five-year contract expires in 2006. “Our starting teachers begin at $33,500 and our highest paid will be $87,000 in the final year,” Feola said. “The average presently is $66,214.” Feola told me that the school board voted 9-0 for the present contract.

            Quakertown’s salaries are higher. “Contract teachers are paid a minimum of $39,544 to a maximum of $88,321,” Jim Scanlon, the Superintendent said. “The average salary is $72,956. We’re into the second of a three-year contract. I think that the [school board] vote was 9-0.”

            Four of the nine Upper Perkiomen school directors voted no. One of them, Lori Burnley, is expected to seek reelection this year. Three others who voted for the contract will run as well (John Gehman, Harry Quinque, and William Sands).

            Whenever teacher’s salaries increase, and they do each year, so do property taxes. Why would anyone want to run for the school board, I wondered? Armed with threats of teacher strikes, teacher unions determine the budget and the tax rate. The state Board of Education controls the curricula. A school board’s only real power is the obligation to occasionally choose the school superintendent.

            “Fortunately, we’ve had no trouble attracting school board candidates,” Kirby replied. “The four members who voted no were eloquent in their statements. Most of them read prepared statements. Each of them thought long and hard as to what was the best thing to do.” The school board knew that the new contract would raise property taxes.

            Everyone knows that the property tax is hurting senior citizens living on fixed incomes. Why won’t the legislature allow the 501 school districts abandon the property tax and substitute a sales or income tax? Ditto for the 67 counties and 2,600 municipalities. Ask your legislator for the answer.

            Kirby told me that Upper Perk has not had a teacher’s strike since Act 195 was implemented in the 1970’s. Kirby believes that the school board was willing to trade five years of labor peace for about four percent annual increases. In the meantime, all 501-state teachers’ unions want to be the highest paid. That’s called parity.

            When will the legislature fix this mess? The legislators won’t do it on their own. Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court will finally intervene…and we won’t like that either.

 

Sincerely,

Charles Meredith